Articles, Blog

New York Times Editorial Board Breaks With Convention And Endorses Two Candidates | Deadline | MSNBC

January 21, 2020

You Might Also Like


  • Reply Ford Bronco January 21, 2020 at 12:53 am

    New Joe Biden book

  • Reply larryhon22 January 21, 2020 at 12:53 am

    Love wasted endorsements

  • Reply Make Racists Afraid Again January 21, 2020 at 12:53 am

    I'm voting against Evil, Impeached Trump.

  • Reply Gennadiy Sharashkin January 21, 2020 at 12:57 am

    Warren is a snake. Klobuchar is inconsequential. Waste of endorsements.

  • Reply Its True January 21, 2020 at 12:58 am

    Remove the bedbugs Trump from White House!!!
    Trump is Enemy of USA!!


  • Reply David J January 21, 2020 at 12:58 am

    Trump losing to a female would definitely be poetic justice for the more than 20 women that he's assaulted.

  • Reply Billy Pardew January 21, 2020 at 12:58 am

    LOL LOL all b***** aside who do you have that's going to be Trump because you certainly don't have them yet

  • Reply AntiFaith January 21, 2020 at 12:58 am

    They endorsed a woman who just tanked her campaign by attacking Bernie, and another who can't break into the top five for polling.

    What a pathetic joke.

  • Reply Jeriba Shigan January 21, 2020 at 1:03 am

    It's true Warren used to be a republican but she was a Native American then.

  • Reply Mind Freshener January 21, 2020 at 1:03 am

    Where is the unibrow man who pretends to be a "Lesbian"?
    Is Transvest|te "Rachel" gone in hiding after his Parnas fiasco?

  • Reply Ro G January 21, 2020 at 1:06 am

    The Times would probably endorse a can of soup over t'rump.
    It may be a can of soup but at least we know it won't ask a foreign country to help it win an election! 😆😅

  • Reply Power corrupts January 21, 2020 at 1:06 am

    It will be nice to have someone in the white house again with a soul and a fully functioning brain. I miss that.

  • Reply ArtOfAwareness January 21, 2020 at 1:06 am

    Love Bernie and yet one of these two has serious viability where Bernie has not.

  • Reply PCBacklash _ January 21, 2020 at 1:07 am

    I'm no prognosticator, but I'm beginning to catch the first whiffs of a Biden/Klobuchar ticket.  It makes sense geographically, and it will allow Biden to go down in history as vice-president to the first black president, and president with the first female vice-president.  That sort of legacy would be very enticing.

  • Reply rastapatch Mail January 21, 2020 at 1:08 am

    NYT times gives full support twice. 200%! Lol.

  • Reply Jason Lewis January 21, 2020 at 1:09 am

    "President Pinocchio"
    Nice Nicolle.

  • Reply rastapatch Mail January 21, 2020 at 1:09 am

    I'm not voting for a woman until they quit mentioning her gender. Period.

  • Reply A C January 21, 2020 at 1:09 am

    I can see Warren maybe, however she's too wishy washy, but Klobuchar, she's a wreck! Sorry but NYT is not is not in touch with regular folks! But i'll vote for anyone who's not the orange clown, I would vote for Biden if he was the candidate even if he's half republican and has a terrible voting record.

  • Reply Jason John January 21, 2020 at 1:10 am

    And the New York Times officially makes itself irrelevant.

  • Reply rastapatch Mail January 21, 2020 at 1:11 am

    They trying to sell us a ticket we don't want because those 2 can both be bought.
    If the dems force again like with HRC they will get low turnout, and possibly lose.

  • Reply 777 burro January 21, 2020 at 1:11 am

    So What!

  • Reply David Boatman January 21, 2020 at 1:12 am

    Pity endorsement! LMFAO why would you pick the losers of the debate? These gals will never be president! Bernie 2020

  • Reply Barbara King January 21, 2020 at 1:14 am

    President Warrer and Klobuchar

  • Reply Baxter Powel January 21, 2020 at 1:16 am

  • Reply chimpakawanzelu January 21, 2020 at 1:17 am

    hahaha… picked not one, but two losers. also, these two are polar opposites. what was your logic? i think that we all know. they will both drop out after super tuesday.

  • Reply Gary Lopez January 21, 2020 at 1:18 am

    Oh yes, they've broken convention alright… they've endorsed TWO Dems instead of only one, which they've done consistently since 1964! Puppets of the left! Sure, go ahead and put another Dem in The WH so our economy can go right back into the toilet. IDIOTS!

  • Reply Trump News January 21, 2020 at 1:18 am

    Nyt is sorry news paper lot's of fake news

  • Reply Thomas Milne January 21, 2020 at 1:19 am

    What a liar

    Bernie is the most popular among men, women, everyone. The NYT is a joke.

  • Reply DangerDave January 21, 2020 at 1:20 am

    Women rock.

  • Reply wolfman02 January 21, 2020 at 1:21 am

    The New York Times is gonna endorse Amy Klobuchar, who doesn't have a prayer of winning the Dem nomination, who's ALWAYS been NOWHERE'SVILLE in the polls, who has CLEARLY never been the voter's choice in any poll in this election and would probably be the one of the absolute weakest candidates against Trump? Unbelievable.

  • Reply Cool Hand Mark January 21, 2020 at 1:21 am

    NYT = Code for FOX

  • Reply roy smith January 21, 2020 at 1:22 am


  • Reply roy smith January 21, 2020 at 1:24 am

  • Reply She's my President January 21, 2020 at 1:24 am

    What is psychological operations? How come MSNBCannibals cannot win hearts and minds and rely on ChiCom troll farm bots for views and likes?

  • Reply Todestanz January 21, 2020 at 1:26 am

    Bernie all the way, specially after the me too hit job done to him by warren and media.

  • Reply Democrat Resistance January 21, 2020 at 1:27 am

    Biden !!! he can heal america and we get progressive in 2024.

  • Reply Canuck Fundy January 21, 2020 at 1:28 am

    I have nothing against either of these ladies, however it seems to me that corporate media will get behind "anyone but Bernie". If Bernie did win, he might have to face constant in-fighting within the Dems, trying to keep him from implementing Universal Health Care and other such anti-corp policies. I think Bernie's vision is the right one, but I doubt if the powers that be would allow it to happen.

  • Reply Sarah's Song January 21, 2020 at 1:30 am

    Oh Little Town of Bethlehem
    You're not Israel's at all
    Jerusalem -where Jesus hung
    Oh hear the terrorist's call
    We own you too
    We own you
    And soon one day you'll see
    Your god is dead
    He is dead
    We'll stop his prophecies

    Yet He came to Bethlehem
    As Micah (5:2) prophesied
    Isaiah (ch.53) foretold
    Why he'd come
    -To offer up His life
    Ezekiel (ch.36, 37, 38, 39) clearly told us
    When he will come again-
    Zechariah (12:2) wrote,
    "When Jerusalem
    is a cup of trembling."

    Look! Far north of Bethlehem!
    They're gathering all around!
    Watch Damascus
    Very soon
    It will come crashing down! (Isaiah 17:1)
    But not far from the Golan
    -Where the armies will arrive
    Is a place called Armageddon
    God waits…
    Just as prophecied…

    (Sung to the tune of "Oh Little Town of Bethlehem")

  • Reply newmove January 21, 2020 at 1:31 am

    It would be a hoot if Megan Kelly stood against dump.

  • Reply John Hanks January 21, 2020 at 1:34 am

    The prescription is Democratic Socialism equalising wealth and power, and the same with nature.  It must  be world wide and so impossible.  People with common sense are honest and they have a thirst for knowledge.   Bernie doesn't lie, Warren was accused  of being a liar and she did.  (Another corrrupt  Another Republicrat fool insecure with ambition, Republicrat the corruption party  because they are fools for wars for property, ignoring the consequences  They are still fools for carbon and nuke property thinking it is OK.  They are insecure fools for war and CRAPitalism. (Not Capitalism)  They fool people like crooks and they use confidence schemes and protection rackets. invented by insecure men without secure common sense.

  • Reply April Yanko January 21, 2020 at 1:35 am

    You guys stop your videos in the weirdest places

  • Reply pauly smallz January 21, 2020 at 1:35 am

    What a joke

  • Reply birdlynn hubbard January 21, 2020 at 1:40 am

    Because the men are wimps….NO-ONE is standing up to Trump, but the women.

  • Reply Sam S4567 January 21, 2020 at 1:43 am

    Call the dump to testify.

  • Reply Floyd Schneider January 21, 2020 at 1:43 am

    On Aug 9th 2012 Elizabeth Warren wrote undocumented immigrants "go to the back of the line. "It must uphold existing laws, protecting our borders and enforcing our laws against recruiting, hiring, and exploiting undocumented workers.

    You cannot make this stuff up lol Warren wanted to prevent undocumented workers from working and send them to the back of the line

    The Wayback machine does not lie!!


    go to link

    ISSUES Immigration
    The rich tapestry of our country came together through immigration. We are a unique country precisely because we embrace so many differences. Our diversity makes us stronger, more innovative, and more creative. My son-in-law and the father of my three grandchildren immigrated here as a young adult. His story and countless stories from millions of other families reach backfor generations, creating our uniquely American story. We weave together in new ways and it helps keep us vital.

    We need common sense, comprehensive immigration reform. Any reform should have three components:

    It must uphold existing laws, protecting our borders and enforcing our laws against recruiting, hiring, and exploiting undocumented workers.It needs to be fair to all taxpayers and to legal immigrants. There should be a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, but one that would require them to pay taxes and go to the back of the line.It needs to help us retain talent trained at our world-class institutions and support job creation.That kind of immigration reform would be true to the rule of law, to our tradition as a nation of immigrants, and to our need to invest in the future.

  • Reply Kathryn Shaw January 21, 2020 at 1:49 am

    The reality is that true conservatives have been slowly leaving the Republican Party for the last 40-50 years. The Republican Party is currently servicing the super-rich primarily. The previous conservatives have gone over to the Democrats. Now, the Democratic Party has been functioning with two wings. They are both compatible, but their approach is a little different. That's okay. When we vote for our next President, we want someone with the strength, intelligence and will to lead the way. Details are the work of the House and Senate to research, evaluate and resolve. We the People must remain clear that we are electing someone that we trust to point us in the right direction. We already have a functioning House. We the People must elect a Senate that is capable of working for a living. When the Senate Majority Leader changes back to a Democrat, House Resolutions will flow once again as they were meant to. The Senators will have the opportunity to change, confer, approve or disapprove the legislation that the House has proposed. There are years of hard work and public necessity represented in that pile of Resolutions that McConnell has been blocking. If the Republicans were working for Americans, McConnell would not have been allowed to block all that legislation. Just as if Republicans were working for Americans, they would consider it their duty to get to the bottom of this impeachment scandal. They would insist on investigating. No, the Republicans have been proving for more than 3 years that they can not be trusted with legislation. This impeachment trial will give them one more opportunity to prove their sincerity. We'll see what happens.

  • Reply BLAIR M Schirmer January 21, 2020 at 1:50 am

    Progressives might want to consider that the NYTimes, the Corporate paper of record, sees little distance between Warren and Klobuchar.

  • Reply ronniet71 January 21, 2020 at 1:54 am

    Klobuchar is not winning, nice lady but way to bland. Warren has spice which is good .

  • Reply ronniet71 January 21, 2020 at 1:58 am

    The people see the authenticity of Bernie and that the quality of a leader. NYT will never endorse the best man nor do we expect them to. I’m

  • Reply BurtTurbo January 21, 2020 at 1:58 am

  • Reply Joel J January 21, 2020 at 1:58 am

    Just happen to be two women. Oh, please!

  • Reply Mitch Hakker January 21, 2020 at 1:59 am

    Lol “rethink what it means to be electable” yeah I think the only way a dem gets in is to rethink electable

  • Reply Matthew Riggs January 21, 2020 at 1:59 am

    hahahaha nyt is trash

  • Reply Roger Wilco January 21, 2020 at 2:07 am


  • Reply Kuala Rompin Bandar Blackout January 21, 2020 at 2:07 am

    Since NYT so woke, where is Tulsi Gabbard endorsement? She is a woman, a strong independent woman, plus a minority too. I guess NYT is not woke enough.

  • Reply spotts000 January 21, 2020 at 2:09 am


  • Reply 10,000 of you for 1 Charlie Whiskey January 21, 2020 at 2:11 am

    Warrens only crime was defeating Bernie in another debate

  • Reply Christian 153 January 21, 2020 at 2:11 am

    Bernie is going to get shafted by his own party again.

  • Reply Terri Mabrey January 21, 2020 at 2:12 am


  • Reply Jim Hower January 21, 2020 at 2:29 am

    Look at all the white faces. That's the democratic party for you.

  • Reply Rebecca Harris Kotula January 21, 2020 at 2:30 am

    All of the things you cite for these two women exist in spades in Bernie. Why not endorse Bernie? MSM corporate.

  • Reply Luke Lim January 21, 2020 at 2:38 am

    How silly. Warren might still be a force to contend with. But klobuchar?…. She dont even have 10 percent in any polls. What a great example on being bias. What a joke.

  • Reply phanders January 21, 2020 at 2:41 am

    great choices, Warren: a progressive who can get things done and Klobuchar: a moderate who has a track record of winning, and can win again.

  • Reply Daddy Cool January 21, 2020 at 2:53 am

    women rock – forking sexist

  • Reply Steve Folkes January 21, 2020 at 2:54 am

    Progressive v. Moderate? Why? It is insane – yes, insane – to think that ANY of these candidates will come in and overturn everything; to immediately implement a radical Progressive agenda. I wanted Sanders/Warren in 2016, but I knew back then that extreme at the input is going to get processed to watered down at the output. Even Trump, damaging as he certainly is, did not get anywhere near his full wishes.

  • Reply Laura Lafauve January 21, 2020 at 2:58 am

    New energy! New jobs!
    Adequate, equitable pay!

  • Reply David R. January 21, 2020 at 3:01 am

    Strong candidates…lol. Great that they are both women. Where is a person of color?

  • Reply Michigan J Frog January 21, 2020 at 3:03 am

    Sorry nyt.. Bernie 2020!!! Everyone I know wants BERNIE 🇺🇸 2020!!! Men Rock too!! Biden is greeting people at Wal-Mart.. Trump will mop him up in a debate..

  • Reply Jazz Haze January 21, 2020 at 3:03 am

    Few differences? Tom Steyer is NOT a career politician! He is an honest worker… But oh well…. Rich white guys, I suppose, aren't supposed to be honest, so nobody knows how to deal with him.

  • Reply reylirinald27 January 21, 2020 at 3:11 am

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 yeah ok!

  • Reply Joe C. January 21, 2020 at 3:18 am

    NYT can endorse establishment candidates all they want but the people are standing with Bernard Sanders. We are not letting the establishment Democrats give us another Trump term.

  • Reply madeline welsh January 21, 2020 at 3:19 am

    Klobuchar needs to drop out. Warren is just a less good version of Bernie.

  • Reply Clayton Porter January 21, 2020 at 3:25 am

    1:50 and 2:08, "the two women" slip, seems to be a tell as to a slanted choice towards gender. The optics of choosing two candidates that are widely separated on the spectrum from middle to left leaning with many candidates in between that happen to be women, even if unintentional, appears to be agenda driven.

  • Reply MuckyWaters January 21, 2020 at 3:30 am

    The New York Times Editorial Board is way off base, listen to this podcast by Michael Moore

  • Reply James Williams Junior January 21, 2020 at 3:42 am

    What a joke, hahah

  • Reply James Williams Junior January 21, 2020 at 3:42 am


  • Reply ELmassive91 January 21, 2020 at 3:43 am

    Thanks New York times know everyone knows who not to vote for hahaha

  • Reply James Williams Junior January 21, 2020 at 3:43 am

    NYT: "Endorses any women," I mean seriously wth

  • Reply James Williams Junior January 21, 2020 at 3:43 am

    Even "realist," I mean wth

  • Reply Allan Johnson January 21, 2020 at 4:00 am

    Boomers for Bernie: I think rather than speaking as a conflict within the Democratic Party, maybe it is a FGO.

  • Reply narutodssunny January 21, 2020 at 4:03 am


  • Reply ruth depew January 21, 2020 at 4:23 am

    So Juanita Tolliver's position is that Warren is the better candidate because her campaign has accumulated more wealth than the Klobuchar campaign. This is Monopoly not Democracy. May the richest woman win.

  • Reply Left Is Best January 21, 2020 at 4:40 am

    Klobuchar????? Bahahaaaaa. The NYT is utter trash. They got BERNED the other day by Bernie and they spat the dummy. Disgusting establishment shills.

  • Reply sybylo January 21, 2020 at 4:45 am

    I feel bad for Bernie. He's like screaming get OUT to a room full of deaf people. And by the way stop trying to make "Bernie Bros" happen. It's cringy. We're not equivalent to tRumpers.

  • Reply Marty Schrader January 21, 2020 at 5:01 am

    NYT will do anydamnthing to keep the spotlight off of The Bern.

  • Reply OutsideMax January 21, 2020 at 5:03 am

    So they picked them because they are women. I like Tulsi but not because she's a woman. It's because of her policies and what she stands for. NYT is going downhill

  • Reply TheMoonKingdom January 21, 2020 at 5:05 am

    Why should anyone take these endorsements seriously when you say something like "Bernie bros"? This behavior shows that the whole thing is a blatant farce; & why people don't trust the media.

  • Reply Luis Martinez January 21, 2020 at 5:34 am

    Obviously because they are women. Warren is so different from Klobuchar. I like Warren. I don't dislike Klobuchar…..I hate the racist, immoral moron in the office….

  • Reply DR Dubois January 21, 2020 at 5:37 am

    Corporate media getting behind a couple of corporate democrats. Who'd a thunk it?!

  • Reply DragonFae16 January 21, 2020 at 5:47 am

    Biden is a gentleman and Trump is street fighter – Biden can't win against below the belt fighting. The two women have a chance if they tell Trump to back off as Hillary should have done. Of all the others, Bernie has the most fire and the most facts to his finger tips. The people will decide if they want a democratically run country or a dictatorship where Trump makes himself king.

  • Reply tesladrive1 January 21, 2020 at 6:11 am

    It doesn't matter! Any one of them is better than Trump! The Dems have my vote straight down the line this time! Sorry Jill Stein! Your ahead of your time! But we need to spank the party of greed and selfishness!

  • Reply AJ _Sa January 21, 2020 at 6:47 am

    Yeah, your bias against Bernie is showing. Should we really believe you would be for someone who speaks against Corporations like yours? Pleaassee!

  • Leave a Reply